Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2020 · 93 citations · 24 references
AgricultureOcean EngineeringResource EconomicsEnergy EconomicsMarine Renewable EnergyRenewable Energy SystemsEnergy ConversionMarine Energy EconomicsOcean Energy SystemsRenewable EnergyRenewable Energy EconomicsRenewable Energy TechnologyHuman Capital CostsLevelized Cost Of ElectricityLevelized Cost Of EnergyMarine Renewable Energy ConversionOcean Thermal Energy ConversionOperational Energy CostsPower OutputThermal Conversion
OTEC has a theoretical global potential of up to 30 TW, yet its economic viability remains unclear because the technology is immature, lacks commercial operation, and suffers from a dearth of long‑term data. The paper reviews literature since 2005 to critically assess current economic evaluation practices for OTEC and proposes a research agenda addressing the identified gaps. The authors conduct a systematic review of academic and industrial studies from 2005 onward, critically evaluating existing economic assessment methods for OTEC. They identify seven key gaps in OTEC economic analyses: a focus on individual plants, omission of location‑specific output, uncertainty in capital and operating costs, insufficient treatment of interest rates, neglect of learning effects, and overreliance on LCOE while ignoring other financial metrics.
Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) is a Renewable Energy Technology (RET) with a global theoretical potential of up to 30 TW. However, OTEC's economic potential is unknown as it is still an immature technology with no commercial plant operating. This paper reviews recent academic and industrial literature since 2005 to provide an overview and critical discussion of current practices in assessing OTEC's economics. Seven knowledge gaps are identified; (1) Current economic analyses focus on individual plants instead of the collective economic potential within spatial boundaries; (2) Natural, location-specific influences on the real net power output are mostly omitted. There is uncertainty about (3) the capital costs on both system and component level as well as the (4) operational costs and properties like useful lifetime. (5) The impact of interest rates and its selection are often not argued for in literature. (6) Technological learning is predominantly omitted in OTEC literature and if treated, it deviates from insights on technological learning. (7) Economic analyses are mostly limited to the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE), while other tools like payback period and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are neglected. These shortcomings originate mainly from the lack of experience and long-term operational data. For each knowledge gap a recommendation for future research is proposed resulting in a research agenda on OTEC and its economics.
24
009 Offshore Technology Conference
E. Corbin, Immediate Past President · 2009 · 2.3K citations
Encyclopedia of physical science and technology
Choice Reviews Online · 2002 · 2.1K citations
Natural Sciences, Chemistry, Physics +12
Global experience curves for wind farms
Martin Junginger, André Faaij, Wim Turkenburg · Energy Policy · 2003 · 346 citations