Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · 2020 · 64 citations · 16 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMolecular BiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMolecular DiagnosticsVirologyInfectious Disease Molecular TestingPolymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory Pathogen DiagnosticsRna-based DiagnosticsViral DiagnosticsViral Rna BiologyNasopharyngeal Swab CollectionPcr-based DetectionPolymerase Chain Reaction DetectionReal-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Pcr)Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction AssaysReverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-pcr)Room-temperature StorageSars-cov-2 Infection
Objectives: The direct identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs is recommended for diagnosing the novel COVID-19 disease. Pre-analytical determinants, such as sampling procedures, time and temperature storage conditions, might impact on the end result. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of sampling procedures, time and temperature of the primary nasopharyngeal swabs storage on real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) results. Methods: Each nasopharyngeal swab obtained from 10 hospitalized patients for COVID-19 was subdivided in 15 aliquots: five were kept at room temperature; five were refrigerated (+4 °C); five were immediately mixed with the extraction buffer and refrigerated at +4 °C. Every day and for 5 days, one aliquot per condition was analyzed (rRT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 gene E and RNaseP and threshold cycles (Ct) compared. To evaluate manual sampling, 70 nasopharyngeal swabs were sampled twice by two different operators and analyzed separately one from the other. Results: A total of 6/10 swabs were SARS-CoV-2 positive. No significant time or storage-dependent variations were observed in SARS-CoV-2 Ct. Re-sampling of swabs with SARS-CoV-2 Ct lower than 33 resulted in highly reproducible results (CV=2.9%), while a high variability was observed when Ct values were higher than 33 (CV=10.3%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that time and temperature of nasopharyngeal swabs storage do not significantly impact on results reproducibility. However, swabs sampling is a critical step, and especially in case of low viral load, might be a potential source of diagnostic errors.
16
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
Victor M. Corman, Olfert Landt, Marco Kaiser et al. · Eurosurveillance · 2020 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens
Yanli Xu, Ruqin Gao, Roujian Lu et al. · JAMA · 2020 · 5.3K citations · Full text
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2
Nandini Sethuraman, Sundararaj Stanleyraj Jeremiah, Akihide Ryo · JAMA · 2020 · 1.6K citations
The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19
Pan Zhai, Yanbing Ding, Xia Wu et al. · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · 2020 · 1.1K citations · Full text