Publication | Open Access
No evidence of homeostatic regulation of leaf temperature in <i>Eucalyptus parramattensis</i> trees: integration of CO<sub>2</sub> flux and oxygen isotope methodologies
30
Citations
63
References
2020
Year
Thermoregulation of leaf temperature (T<sub>leaf</sub> ) may foster metabolic homeostasis in plants, but the degree to which T<sub>leaf</sub> is moderated, and under what environmental contexts, is a topic of debate. Isotopic studies inferred the temperature of photosynthetic carbon assimilation to be a constant value of c. 20°C; by contrast, leaf biophysical theory suggests a strong dependence of T<sub>leaf</sub> on environmental drivers. Can this apparent disparity be reconciled? We continuously measured T<sub>leaf</sub> and whole-crown net CO<sub>2</sub> uptake for Eucalyptus parramattensis trees growing in field conditions in whole-tree chambers under ambient and +3°C warming conditions, and calculated assimilation-weighted leaf temperature (T<sub>L-AW</sub> ) across 265 d, varying in air temperature (T<sub>air</sub> ) from -1 to 45°C. We compared these data to T<sub>L-AW</sub> derived from wood cellulose δ<sup>18</sup> O. T<sub>leaf</sub> exhibited substantial variation driven by T<sub>air</sub> , light intensity, and vapor pressure deficit, and T<sub>leaf</sub> was strongly linearly correlated with T<sub>air</sub> with a slope of c. 1.0. T<sub>L-AW</sub> values calculated from cellulose δ<sup>18</sup> O vs crown fluxes were remarkably consistent; both varied seasonally and in response to the warming treatment, tracking variation in T<sub>air</sub> . The leaves studied here were nearly poikilothermic, with no evidence of thermoregulation of T<sub>leaf</sub> towards a homeostatic value. Importantly, this work supports the use of cellulose δ<sup>18</sup> O to infer T<sub>L-AW</sub> , but does not support the concept of strong homeothermic regulation of T<sub>leaf</sub>.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1