arXiv (Cornell University) · 2020 · 62 citations · 20 references
Natural ResourcesEnvironmental ManagementArtificial IntelligenceEcological RestorationForest RestorationArtificial Intelligence GovernanceEcological Impact AssessmentEcosystem GovernanceForest PlanningImpact IdentificationStakeholder AnalysisAi Governance FrameworksAi Impact AssessmentArtificial Intelligence Impact AssessmentAssessment Framework DevelopmentForest Ecosystem RestorationForest Environmental Impact AssessmentImpact AssessmentResponsible Ai
Companies have considered adoption of various high-level artificial intelligence (AI) principles for responsible AI, but there is less clarity on how to implement these principles as organizational practices. This paper reviews the principles-to-practices gap. We outline five explanations for this gap ranging from a disciplinary divide to an overabundance of tools. In turn, we argue that an impact assessment framework which is broad, operationalizable, flexible, iterative, guided, and participatory is a promising approach to close the principles-to-practices gap. Finally, to help practitioners with applying these recommendations, we review a case study of AI's use in forest ecosystem restoration, demonstrating how an impact assessment framework can translate into effective and responsible AI practices.
20
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Brent Mittelstadt · Nature Machine Intelligence · 2019 · 1.5K citations · Full text
The Business Firm as A Political Coalition
James G. March · The Journal of Politics · 1962 · 577 citations
Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione et al. · Communications of the ACM · 2021 · 334 citations · Full text