Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Relational, ethically sound co-production in mental health care research: epistemic injustice and the need for an ethics of care

97

Citations

25

References

2020

Year

TLDR

Co‑production and service‑user involvement are increasingly encouraged in mental health care research, yet power hierarchies can influence the knowledge produced by stakeholders. The article aims to deepen understanding of relational dynamics in co‑researching teams and larger stakeholder groups by reflecting on a psychiatric emergency care co‑production process that highlights researchers’ ethical responsibilities toward power dynamics. The authors reflect on a psychiatric emergency care co‑production process and employ an ethics‑of‑care framework to guide ethical reflection and manage relational dynamics. The reflection revealed that service‑user voices were silenced, reinforcing epistemic injustice, but adopting a “tend and befriend” approach fostered relationally sound co‑production, bringing teams together for solidarity, support, and advice.

Abstract

Co-production and service user involvement are increasingly encouraged in mental health care research. However, power hierarchies in knowledge can affect the co-production of knowledge by stakeholders. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to deepen our understanding of the relational dynamics at stake in co-researching teams and larger groups of stakeholders involved in research. We reflect on a process of co-production in psychiatric emergency care and show the ethical responsibilities of researchers in dealing with the power dynamics. A collaborative reflection on the process of co-production shows that the voices of service users, who participated as co-researchers, were silenced, thereby reinforcing epistemic injustice. Ethics of care offered guidance for ethical reflection and ways to manage relational dynamics. Instead of 'fight and flight', the 'tend and befriend' option was fruitful for relational ethically sound co-production, leading to teams and stakeholders jointly reflecting on knowledge co-production. Relational reflexive work brings people together for solidarity, support, and advice.

References

YearCitations

Page 1