Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2020 · 759 citations · 15 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacotherapyCancer PharmacologyChemotherapyOncology PharmacotherapyLung CancerLung Cancer PharmacotherapyTargeted Cancer TherapyTargeted TherapyAnaplastic Lymphoma Kinase InhibitorsEfficacy BoundariesPembrolizumab TherapyPlacebo ComparatorsRecist CriteriaSmall Cell Lung Cancer TherapySmall Cell Lung Cancer Treatment
PURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy has shown antitumor activity in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-604 study compared pembrolizumab plus etoposide and platinum (EP) with placebo plus EP for patients with previously untreated extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or saline placebo for up to 35 cycles plus 4 cycles of EP. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST version 1.1, blinded central review) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response were secondary end points. Prespecified efficacy boundaries were one-sided P = .0048 for PFS and .0128 for OS. RESULTS Of the 453 participants, 228 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus EP and 225 to placebo plus EP. Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91; P = .0023). Twelve-month PFS estimates were 13.6% with pembrolizumab plus EP and 3.1% with placebo plus EP. Although pembrolizumab plus EP prolonged OS, the significance threshold was not met (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98; P = .0164). Twenty-four-month OS estimates were 22.5% and 11.2%, respectively. ORR was 70.6% in the pembrolizumab plus EP group and 61.8% in the placebo plus EP group; the estimated proportion of responders remaining in response at 12 months was 19.3% and 3.3%, respectively. In the pembrolizumab plus EP and placebo plus EP groups, respectively, any-cause adverse events were grade 3-4 in 76.7% and 74.9%, grade 5 in 6.3% and 5.4%, and led to discontinuation of any drug in 14.8% and 6.3%. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS compared with placebo plus EP as first-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. No unexpected toxicities were seen with pembrolizumab plus EP. These data support the benefit of pembrolizumab in ES-SCLC.
15
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Leena Gandhi, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Shirish M. Gadgeel et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 6.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +16
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Luis Paz‐Ares, Alexander Luft, David Vicente et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 3.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +17
Luis Paz‐Ares, Mikhail Dvorkin, Yuanbin Chen et al. · The Lancet · 2019 · 2.2K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +14