Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · 2020 · 20 citations · 14 references
MedicineChild HealthPediatricsHealth Services ResearchPediatric CarePrimary CareCare NavigationCommunity Resource NavigationCommunity Resource ReferralHealth Care NavigationPatient NavigationResource ReferralAccess To Social ResourcesChi-square TestEnrollmentHealthcare Utilization By ChildrenPatient Navigation In ReferralsPediatric Health Care UtilizationPediatric Healthcare UtilizationSocial Care Needs Assessment
Background: Patient navigation is increasingly being used by pediatric health care delivery systems to address patients’ unmet social needs. However, it is not known whether navigators working remotely can be as effective at linking families to community resources as on-site navigators. The aim of this study was to assess whether a patient navigator located on-site versus remotely is more likely to receive referrals from clinicians, successfully follow-up with patients, and assist families with enrollment in social needs resources. Methods: A patient navigator worked on-site and remotely as she divided her time between 4 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) from May 2015 to June 2019. We conducted a 1-sample test of proportion comparing the proportion of on-site referrals made with the proportion of the week spent in each FQHC. To assess the impact of on-site versus remote referrals on number of contacts with a family, we conducted a 2-sample t test. We used chi-square testing to assess the effect of on-site versus remote status on resource enrollment. Results: Of the referrals (N = 414) made to the patient navigator, the majority were made through the electronic health record (83%) versus in person (17%) ( P < .0001). When the navigator was on-site, significantly more referrals were made than expected (45% vs 29%, P < .0001). Between remote and on-site referral groups, there was no significant difference in number of contact points (1.0 vs 1.1 points, P = .32) or in the proportion of families who received a resource (4.6% vs 5.1%, P = .31). Conclusion: Our results indicate that clinicians were significantly more likely to refer families to patient navigation if the navigator was on-site. The likelihood of having contact with the navigator and enrolling in a resource, however, did not differ between families referred when the patient navigator was on-site compared with remote.
14
The Lifelong Effects of Early Childhood Adversity and Toxic Stress
Jack P. Shonkoff, Andrew S. Garner, Ben Siegel et al. · PEDIATRICS · 2011 · 5K citations
Addressing Social Determinants of Health at Well Child Care Visits: A Cluster RCT
Arvin Garg, Sarah Toy, Yorghos Tripodis et al. · PEDIATRICS · 2015 · 643 citations · Full text