Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 2020 · 23 citations · 30 references
Social SciencesEconomicsGame TheoryMicroeconomicsOptimizationAlgorithmic FairnessNash EquilibriumOptimization In EconomicsPareto OptimalityWelfare EconomicsAllocation Of Indivisible GoodsBargaining Over Indivisible GoodsFair DivisionFair Resource AllocationFairnessFairness GuaranteesFairness PropertiesPolynomial-time Algorithms
We consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among n agents. Various fairness notions have been proposed within the rapidly growing field of fair division, but the Nash social welfare (NSW) serves as a focal point. In part, this follows from the ‘unreasonable’ fairness guarantees provided, in the sense that a max NSW allocation meets multiple other fairness metrics simultaneously, all while satisfying a standard economic concept of efficiency, Pareto optimality. However, existing approximation algorithms fail to satisfy all of the remarkable fairness guarantees offered by a max NSW allocation, instead targeting only the specific NSW objective. We address this issue by presenting a 2 max NSW, Prop-1, 1/(2n) MMS, and Pareto optimal allocation in strongly polynomial time. Our techniques are based on a market interpretation of a fractional max NSW allocation. We present novel definitions of fairness concepts in terms of market prices, and design a new scheme to round a market equilibrium into an integral allocation in a way that provides most of the fairness properties of an integral max NSW allocation.
30
Hal R. Varian · Journal of Economic Theory · 1974 · 1K citations · Full text
On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods
R.J. Lipton, Evangelos Markakis, Elchanan Mossel et al. · 2004 · 530 citations
The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare
Ioannis Caragiannis, David Kurokawa, Hervé Moulin et al. · 2016 · 362 citations