Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University · 2019 · 27 citations · 9 references
BusinessAccountingCorporate GovernanceAuditingCorporate FinanceFinancial AccountingAsset MisappropriationFinancial CrimeFinancial Statement FraudFraud DetectionFraud PreventionOccupational FraudAsset Misappropriation PreventionMisappropriation Of Corporate AssetsPurposive ApproachSampling
The objective of this study was to obtain empirical evidence in which a fraud star, representing five contributing factors to fraud, influences asset misappropriation and that internal controls moderate the effect of fraud star with respect to asset misappropriation. The study used a descriptive research method with a quantitative approach. The primary data included 49 indicators distributed to 282 employees who were employed in 5 state-owned companies (BUMN) in Indonesia. The data collection was performed by using a purposive sampling method and analytical method of structural equation modeling (SEM), while partial least square (PLS) were used for data analysis. Based on the results, it showed that the causes commonly associated with fraud, namely pressure, opportunity, justification, and capability have a positive effect on asset misappropriation, while integrity and internal controls operate in the opposite way. It has also been found that internal controls do not undermine the influence of pressure, opportunity, justification, and capability with respect to asset misappropriation. Furthermore, it does not strengthen the influence of integrity on asset misappropriation.
9
Elmo L. Jackson, Kalman J. Cohen, Richard M. Cyert · Southern Economic Journal · 1966 · 2.3K citations
The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud
David T. Wolfe, Dana R. Hermanson · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · 2004 · 968 citations · Full text
Business, Accountancy, Accounting +12
Jack W. Dorminey, A. Scott Fleming, Mary-Jo Kranacher et al. · Issues in Accounting Education · 2012 · 521 citations
Business, Accountancy, Accounting +17