Publication | Closed Access
Cross-Platform State Propaganda: Russian Trolls on Twitter and YouTube during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
170
Citations
47
References
2020
Year
Fake NewsEmerging MediaPublic OpinionPolitical PolarizationPolitical BehaviorCommunicationSow DiscordMedia StudiesJournalismSocial SciencesSocial MediaState MediaMedia ActivismCross-platform State PropagandaSocial Medium NewsPolitical CommunicationContent AnalysisDisinformation DetectionIra TweetsPropaganda StudiesMedia InstitutionsDigital MediaMedia PoliciesSocial Medium IntelligencePolitical CampaignsRussian TrollsMass CommunicationArtsU.s. Presidential ElectionPolitical Science
The study examines the online propaganda tactics of the Internet Research Agency’s Russian trolls during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The authors analyzed 108,781 IRA tweets, focusing on hyperlinks to determine whether the IRA aimed to support Trump or sow discord.
This paper investigates online propaganda strategies of the Internet Research Agency (IRA)—Russian “trolls”—during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. We assess claims that the IRA sought either to (1) support Donald Trump or (2) sow discord among the U.S. public by analyzing hyperlinks contained in 108,781 IRA tweets. Our results show that although IRA accounts promoted links to both sides of the ideological spectrum, “conservative” trolls were more active than “liberal” ones. The IRA also shared content across social media platforms, particularly YouTube—the second-most linked destination among IRA tweets. Although overall news content shared by trolls leaned moderate to conservative, we find troll accounts on both sides of the ideological spectrum, and these accounts maintain their political alignment. Links to YouTube videos were decidedly conservative, however. While mixed, this evidence is consistent with the IRA’s supporting the Republican campaign, but the IRA’s strategy was multifaceted, with an ideological division of labor among accounts. We contextualize these results as consistent with a pre-propaganda strategy. This work demonstrates the need to view political communication in the context of the broader media ecology, as governments exploit the interconnected information ecosystem to pursue covert propaganda strategies.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1