Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2020 · 268 citations · 42 references
ComputingComputer SciencePhysicsOptimizationQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsApproximation MethodsComputational Quantum MechanicsQuantum AlgorithmsQuantum BitsQuantum ComputationQuantum SimulationAlgorithm Performance EvaluationApproximate OptimizationIsing ModelPerformance DegradationQuantum Approximate OptimizationQuantum Many-body SystemsTrapped-ion QubitsVariational Quantum Algorithms
Variational quantum algorithms combine quantum resources with classical optimization to tackle many‑body and optimization problems, but their performance scaling with qubit number remains unclear. The study applies QAOA to approximate the ground‑state energy of a long‑range Ising model and evaluates its performance on a trapped‑ion quantum simulator up to 40 qubits. QAOA is implemented on a trapped‑ion quantum simulator with up to 40 qubits to approximate the ground‑state energy of a long‑range Ising model. The algorithm shows negligible performance loss and near‑constant runtime scaling with qubit number, and error modeling explains the results, indicating progress toward general hybrid quantum‑classical algorithms.
Significance Variational quantum algorithms combine quantum resources with classical optimization methods, providing a promising approach to solve both quantum many-body and classical optimization problems. A crucial question is how variational algorithms perform as a function of qubit number. Here, we address this question by applying a variational quantum algorithm (QAOA) to approximate the ground-state energy of a long-range Ising model, both quantum and classical, and investigating the algorithm performance on a trapped-ion quantum simulator with up to 40 qubits. A negligible performance degradation and almost constant runtime scaling is observed as a function of the number of qubits. By modeling the error sources, we explain the experimental performance, marking a stepping stone toward more general realizations of hybrid quantum–classical algorithms.
42
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
John Preskill · Quantum · 2018 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +17
Simulating physics with computers
Richard P. Feynman · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · 1982 · 7.5K citations
Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, Lorenzo Maccone · Nature Photonics · 2011 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Physics, Metrology +11
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme et al. · Nature · 2017 · 3K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Chemistry, Physics +14