Publication | Closed Access
Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition
245
Citations
51
References
2020
Year
Graph Lstm-in-lstmGraph Neural NetworkImage AnalysisMachine LearningData ScienceEngineeringPattern RecognitionAction PatternFollowing LstmVideo InterpretationComputer ScienceVideo UnderstandingResidual LstmDeep LearningActivity RecognitionGraph LstmGraph ProcessingComputer Vision
This article aims to tackle the problem of group activity recognition in the multiple-person scene. To model the group activity with multiple persons, most long short-term memory (LSTM)-based methods first learn the person-level action representations by several LSTMs and then integrate all the person-level action representations into the following LSTM to learn the group-level activity representation. This type of solution is a two-stage strategy, which neglects the "host-parasite" relationship between the group-level activity ("host") and person-level actions ("parasite") in spatiotemporal space. To this end, we propose a novel graph LSTM-in-LSTM (GLIL) for group activity recognition by modeling the person-level actions and the group-level activity simultaneously. GLIL is a "host-parasite" architecture, which can be seen as several person LSTMs (P-LSTMs) in the local view or a graph LSTM (G-LSTM) in the global view. Specifically, P-LSTMs model the person-level actions based on the interactions among persons. Meanwhile, G-LSTM models the group-level activity, where the person-level motion information in multiple P-LSTMs is selectively integrated and stored into G-LSTM based on their contributions to the inference of the group activity class. Furthermore, to use the person-level temporal features instead of the person-level static features as the input of GLIL, we introduce a residual LSTM with the residual connection to learn the person-level residual features, consisting of temporal features and static features. Experimental results on two public data sets illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed GLIL compared with state-of-the-art methods.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1