The Laryngoscope · 2020 · 23 citations · 16 references
DentistryMaxillofacial SurgerySurgeryAdditive ManufacturingOrthopedicsReconstructive SurgeryComputer-aided Surgical Guide DesignMandibular ReconstructionThree-dimensional ReconstructionVirtual Treatment Planning3D Printed Surgical Guide Workflow3D-printed Surgical GuidesCohort Study InvestigationComputer-aided Design Surgical GuidesComputer-assisted Mandibular ReconstructionComputer-assisted OsteotomySegmental Mandibular ReconstructionThree-dimensional Printed Surgical Guides
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to explore whether the production of in-hospital, low-cost surgical cutting guides would be possible and to assess different cutting guide shapes to facilitate the surgery and the application with instruments. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Using free computer-aided design software, surgical cutting guides for the mandible and fibula were designed and used to perform virtual segmental osteotomies and fibula transplants in seven patients. RESULTS: Fourteen virtual osteotomies were performed using the free software and the proposed workflow. Thirteen guides were then printed to transfer the virtual planning information to the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual planning and the three-dimensional (3D) printing of guides for mandibular reconstruction is reliable with the aid of an in-hospital 3D laboratory. We also demonstrated that different guides with different shapes could be produced with benefits during surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2020.
16
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Don Husereau, Michael Drummond, Stavros Petrou et al. · BMJ · 2013 · 1.8K citations · Full text
David L. Hirsch, Evan S. Garfein, Andrew Christensen et al. · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · 2009 · 342 citations
Frank Wilde, Henning Hanken, Florian Probst et al. · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · 2015 · 205 citations