Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research · 2019 · 12 citations · 30 references
DentistryDental AnesthesiologyEndodonticsAnesthesiaLocal AnesthesiaRoot Canal TherapyAnalgesiaAnesthesia For Dental ProceduresDental Local AnesthesiaLocal Anesthesia For Pain ControlLocal Anesthesia In EndodonticsTooth ExtractionAnesthesia For Mandibular MolarsAnesthesia For Tooth ExtractionIntraseptal AnesthesiaIntraseptal InjectionMandibular Infiltration AnesthesiaPain Assessment After Root Canal TreatmentRoot Canal Treatment PainSupplemental Buccal Infiltration
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the success rate of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anaesthesia in mandibular molars undergoing endodontic therapy/extraction when the inferior alveolar nerve block has failed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective clinical trial including 200 patients undergoing lower molar root canal treatment/teeth extraction was conducted. Only 80 patients of the participants who had profound lower lip anaesthesia after the administration of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) were in pain within treatment. Patients experiencing moderate to severe pain upon using elevators, forceps, bur, or endodontic file were randomly allocated to the 2% lidocaine intraseptal injection and 4% articaine buccal infiltration groups. Level of pain was assessed every 2 to 10 min on standard 100 mm visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Overall, 55 (69%) of patients who were given either intraseptal injection of 2% lidocaine or buccal infiltration of 4% articaine had successful anaesthesia of lower molar teeth within 10 min. However, 25 (31%) of participating patients in the buccal infiltration and the intraseptal groups had failed anaesthesia within the study duration (10 min), and they received additional local anaesthetic. IANBs were more painful than buccal and intraseptal injections. However, buccal articaine injections were significantly more comfortable than intraseptal lidocaine injections (P > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental intraseptal injection of 2% lidocaine and buccal infiltration of 4% articaine achieved profound pulpal anaesthesia in 69% of patients when the inferior alveolar nerve block failed. Recommendations can be given to dental practitioners to use infiltration of 4% articaine in conjunction with intraseptal injection of 2% lidocaine to anaesthetize the lower molar teeth when inferior alveolar nerve block fails.
30
An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain
Marc W. Heft, Scott Parker · Pain · 1984 · 340 citations
Endodontic anesthesia in mandibular molars: A clinical study
Larz S.W. Spångberg · Journal of Endodontics · 1993 · 218 citations
Dentistry, Endodontics, Oral Surgery +16
Mohammad Dib Kanaa, John Whitworth, John Gerard Meechan · Journal of Endodontics · 2012 · 129 citations
Veterinary Medicine, Anesthesiology, Dental Anesthesiology +17