Journal of Thoracic Disease · 2020 · 66 citations · 22 references
MedicineImmunologyOncologyCancer ImmunologyImmunotherapyInflammationBiomarker-guided ImmunotherapyCancer BiomarkersCancer ImmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmuno-oncology BiomarkersOncology NutritionAtezolizumab TherapyNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte RatioNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TreatmentPd-l1 BlockadePrognostic BiomarkersProgrammed Cell Death Ligand 1 InhibitionProgrammed Death-ligand 1 BiomarkerProgrammed Death-ligand 1 Inhibition
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has become the forefront strategy for systemic therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells has been reported as an eligible biomarker of response to such immunotherapies. However, useful biomarkers of response to atezolizumab, an anti PD-L1 antibody, are unestablished. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological characteristics including PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab from January 2018 at our department. In addition, we investigated the prognostic effect of the following pretreatment immune-inflammation-nutritional parameters: prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 64.5 (range, 49-82) years, and 17 (70.8%) were men. Among this cohort, two patients showed high PD-L1 expression (≥50%), seven showed low (1-49%) expression, and the other 15 patients showed 0% or unknown expression. Survival analyses showed that low PNI was an independent predictor of short time to treatment failure (TTF) [hazard ratio (HR) =6.87, P=0.0052], and high NLR (HR =3.53, P=0.0375) and high mGPS (HR =23.2, P=0.0038) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) after atezolizumab. Furthermore, the NLR high/mGPS high group had far worse prognosis than the NLR low/mGPS low group. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic and prognostic effect of atezolizumab may depend on the host immune-nutritional status. This study provided novel but retrospective evidence, and thus further prospective studies are needed.
22
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2019 · 21K citations · Full text
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Martin Reck, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Andrew Robinson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 10.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
H. Borghaei, L. Paz-Ares, Leora Horn et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.5K citations · Full text
Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Edward B. Garon, Naiyer A. Rizvi, Rina Hui et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 6.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17