Energies · 2020 · 31 citations · 35 references
EngineeringBioenergyConference ArticleBiological Waste TreatmentBioelectrochemical ReactorAnaerobic DigestionOrganic SubstratesChemical EngineeringBiomass ConversionBiogasBiochemical EngineeringBiomassHealth SciencesCarbon SequestrationBiogas EfficiencyLaboratory Anaerobic DigestersWaste ManagementEnvironmental EngineeringBiomass ResourceDigestate TreatmentBiogas PlantSustainable Production
This study is an elaboration on the conference article written by the same authors, which presented the results of laboratory tests on the biogas efficiency of the following substrates: maize silage (MS), pig manure (PM), potato waste (PW), and sugar beet pulp (SB). This article presents methane yields from the same substrates, but also on a technical scale. Apart from that, it presents an original methodology of defining the Biochemical Methane Potential Correction Coefficient (BMPCC) based on the calculation of biomass conversion on an industrial scale and on a laboratory scale. The BMPCC was introduced as a tool to enable uncomplicated verification of the operation of a biogas plant to increase its efficiency and prevent undesirable losses. The estimated BMPCC values showed that the volume of methane produced in the laboratory was overestimated in comparison to the amount of methane obtained under technical conditions. There were differences observed for each substrate. They ranged from 4.7% to 17.19% for MS, from 1.14% to 23.58% for PM, from 9.5% to 13.69% for PW, and from 9.06% to 14.31% for SB. The BMPCC enables estimation of biomass under fermentation on an industrial scale, as compared with laboratory conditions.
35
Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cow manure
Ningning Zhai, Tong Zhang, Dongxue Yin et al. · Waste Management · 2015 · 232 citations
The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision
Susanne Theuerl, Christiane Herrmann, Monika Heiermann et al. · Energies · 2019 · 190 citations · Full text