Fixed dose drug combinations – are they pharmacoeconomically sound? Findings and implications especially for lower- and middle-income countries

Brian Godman, Holly McCabe, Trudy Leong, Debjani Mueller, Antony P. Martin, Iris Hoxha, Julius Chacha Mwita, Godfrey Mutashambara Rwegerera, Amos Massele, Juliana de Oliveira Costa,

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · 2020 · 92 citations · 172 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

: FDCs are valued across LMICs. Advantages include potentially improved response rates, reduced adverse reactions, increased adherence rates, and reduced costs. Concerns include increased chances of drug:drug interactions, reduced effectiveness, potential for imprecise diagnoses and higher unjustified prices. Overall certain FDCs including those for malaria, tuberculosis, and hypertension are valued and listed in the country's essential medicine lists, with initiatives needed to enhance their prescribing where currently low prescribing rates. Proposed initiatives include robust clinical and economic data to address the current paucity of pharmacoeconomic data. Irrational FDCs persists in some countries which are being addressed.

References

172