British journal of surgery · 2020 · 10 citations · 25 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineOncologyDiagnostic Nuclear MedicineSurgical OncologySurvival AnalysisCancer StagingCancer Survival AnalysisSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySentinel Lymph Node ImagingStaging Of Skin CancerTumor StagingAxillary Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyCutaneous Melanoma StagingKaplan-meier Survival EstimatesMultivariable Regression AnalysisPatient Outcomes MeasurementPreoperative LymphoscintigraphySentinel Lymph Node Biopsy StagingSentinel Lymph Node Staging
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important staging tool for the management of melanoma. A multicentre study was done to validate previous findings that the timing of lymphoscintigraphy influences the accuracy of SLNB and patient outcomes, particularly survival. METHODS: Data were reviewed on patients undergoing SLNB for melanoma at three centres in the UK and Sweden, examining the effect of timing of SLNB after nuclear medicine scanning. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, stratified by timing of lymphoscintigraphy. Independent risk factors for survival were identified by Cox multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2270 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 56 months. Univariable analysis showed a 4·2 per cent absolute and 35·5 per cent relative benefit in DSS (hazard ratio 1·36, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·74; P = 0·018) for 863 patients whose SLNB was performed up to 12 h after lymphoscintigraphy compared with 1407 patients who had surgery after more than 12 h. There were similar OS and PFS benefits (P = 0·036 and P = 0·022 respectively). Multivariable analysis identified timing of lymphoscintigraphy as an independent predictor of OS (P = 0·017) and DSS (P = 0·030). There was an excess of nodal recurrences as first site of recurrence in the group with delayed surgery (4·5 versus 2·5 per cent; P = 0·008). CONCLUSION: Tc-labelled nanocolloid has a significant negative survival impact in patients with melanoma.
25