Concepedia

Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Robert Z. Tashjian, Jessica Shin, Kortnie Broschinsky, Chih‐Ching Yeh, Brook I. Martin, Peter N. Chalmers, Patrick E. Greis, Robert T. Burks, Yue Zhang

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · 2020 · 149 citations · 14 references

DOI

Concepts

References

14

A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function

Robin R. Richards, Kai‐Nan An, Louis U. Bigliani et al. · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · 1994 · 1.7K citations

, , +14

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness

Lori A. Michener, Philip McClure, Brian J. Sennett · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · 2002 · 1.1K citations

, , +12

Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement

Florence Tubach · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2004 · 1.1K citations · Full text

, , +17

Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

Kay M. Crossley, Kim L. Bennell, S. Cowan et al. · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · 2004 · 699 citations

, , +16

Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease

Robert Z. Tashjian, Julia Deloach, Christina A. Porucznik et al. · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · 2009 · 661 citations

, , +16