Combustion Characteristics of Suspended Hydrocarbon Fuel Droplets with Various Nanoenergetic Additives

John W. Bennewitz, Alireza Badakhshan, Douglas G. Talley

Combustion Science and Technology · 2020 · 10 citations · 43 references

Concepts

Abstract

The burning process of multiple liquid fuels with various nanoenergetic additives is investigated experimentally in the suspended droplet configuration. Specifically, the burning rate constant K and ignition delay τign are measured for two base fuels, rocket grade kerosene (RP-2) and ethanol, with seven energetic additives; the investigated additives include aluminum (Al), magnesium oxide (MgO), graphene, graphene nano-platelet (GNP), as well as numerous soluble additives including ammonia borane (AB), ammonium nitrate (NaAN) and sodium borohydride (NaBH4), all of which do not exceed 6 wt.% loading concentration. Results from these experiments show that in general, there is not a significant modification to the steady burning rate for these nanofuel combinations (averaging <10%) for the loading concentrations considered. Instead, the additives exhibit a majority of particle burning during the end of the droplet lifetime, which generally are short-lived events that do not affect the overall K. This is illustrated by calculating the instantaneous burning rate K˜ for these nanofuels, where K˜ is 2% to 18% higher than pure fuels during the last half of the droplet burn time depending on the additive type. Similarly, nanofuel ignition delays generally only exhibit modest changes for a majority of the investigated combinations, causing only a ±5% change on average. However, two nanofuels consisting of ethanol with 5 wt.% soluble ammonia borane and RP-2 with 1 wt.% suspended graphene do exhibit increases in τign of approximately 20 and 30%, respectively. These nanofuel compounds also exhibit substantial qualitative combustion behavioral changes including flame color changes and micro-droplet shedding events for ethanol with ammonia borane, as well as a notable reduction in the average burning rate of 20% for RP-2 with graphene. Therefore, these two nanofuel combinations may be candidates for further study as a means to garner control of combustion dynamics in a reacting liquid rocket spray environment.

References

43