Publication | Open Access
Prognostic value of a three-scale grading system based on combining molecular imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias
37
Citations
22
References
2020
Year
We investigated on the added prognostic value of a three-scale combined molecular imaging with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, (compared to Ki-67 based histological grading), in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia patients. 85 patients with histologically proven metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias, who underwent combined PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Highest Ki-67 value available at time of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was recorded. Patients were classified according to World Health Organization/European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society histological grades (G1, G2, G3) and into three distinct imaging categories (C1: all lesions are <sup>18</sup>F-FDG negative/<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE positive, C2: patients with one or more <sup>18</sup>F-FDG positive lesions, all of them <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE positive, C3: patients with one or more <sup>18</sup>F-FDG positive lesions, at least one of them <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE negative). The primary endpoint of the study was Progression-Free Survival, assessed from the date of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT to the date of radiological progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Classification according to histological grade did not show significant statistical difference in median Progression-Free Survival between G1 and G2 but was significant between G2 and G3 patients. In contrast, median Progression-Free Survival was significantly higher in C1 compared to C2 and in C2 compared to C3 patients, revealing three distinctive imaging categories, each with highly distinctive prognosis. Our three-scale combined <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging classification holds high prognostic value in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1