Applied Sciences · 2020 · 108 citations · 95 references
EngineeringMachine LearningMachine Learning ToolBlastingFeature SelectionGeotechnical EngineeringSupport Vector MachineVibration EnvironmentData ScienceData MiningPattern RecognitionPpv AnalysisMining EngineeringPredictive AnalyticsStructural Health MonitoringData ClassificationPeak Particle VelocityBlast-induced Ground VibrationCivil EngineeringGround VibrationBlast EngineeringRandom Forest TechniquesClassifier System
Ground vibration from quarry blasting is a critical concern in mining and civil engineering, yet the application of machine learning to predict peak particle velocity remains largely unexplored. This study aims to compare the predictive performance of five machine‑learning classifiers—CART, CHAID, RF, ANN, and SVM—for peak particle velocity analysis using a comprehensive quarry site database. Feature selection was first applied to identify the most influential input parameters for PPV before developing the models. Random forest outperformed all other models, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy for PPV, and the methodology can inform future research and design in similar contexts.
In mining and civil engineering applications, a reliable and proper analysis of ground vibration due to quarry blasting is an extremely important task. While advances in machine learning led to numerous powerful regression models, the usefulness of these models for modeling the peak particle velocity (PPV) remains largely unexplored. Using an extensive database comprising quarry site datasets enriched with vibration variables, this article compares the predictive performance of five selected machine learning classifiers, including classification and regression trees (CART), chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) for PPV analysis. Before conducting these model developments, feature selection was applied in order to select the most important input parameters for PPV. The results of this study show that RF performed substantially better than any of the other investigated regression models, including the frequently used SVM and ANN models. The results and process analysis of this study can be utilized by other researchers/designers in similar fields.
95
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 119.3K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 39.8K citations · Full text
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
2003 · 6.6K citations