Publication | Open Access
Diagnostic value of platelet‐lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin‐platelet ratio in patients with rectal cancer
33
Citations
21
References
2020
Year
Surgical OncologyPathologyThrombosisOncologyCancer DetectionHematologyRadiation OncologyMolecular OncologyCancer ResearchHealth SciencesRectal Cancer PatientsMalignant DiseaseHemoglobin‐platelet RatioThrombopoiesisPrognostic BiomarkersTumoral PathologyBlood PlateletMalignant Blood DisorderMedicineRectal CancerPlatelet‐lymphocyte Ratio
Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of platelet‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and hemoglobin‐platelet ratio (HPR) combined or not with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in rectal cancer. Methods We recruited 235 patients pathologically diagnosed with rectal cancer, 113 patients with benign rectal diseases, and 229 healthy control patients in this retrospective analysis. Then, the correlation between PLR, HPR, and clinicopathological findings was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of PLR and HPR combined or not with CEA in rectal cancer patients. Results The levels of PLR, HPR, and CEA were higher in rectal cancer patients than those in the subjects with benign rectal diseases ( P < .001) and the healthy controls ( P < .001). Platelet‐lymphocyte ratio and HPR were associated with lymph node metastasis and tumor stage, rather than serosa invasion, distant metastasis, or tumor size. PLR or HPR combined with CEA produced larger area under curve (AUC) (AUC PLR+CEA = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.70‐0.79, AUC HPR+CEA = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.71‐0.80) than PLR ( P < .0001), HPR ( P < .0001), or CEA ( P = .024) alone. Conclusion Our results suggest that PLR or HPR combined with CEA can increase diagnostic efficacy and may be a useful diagnostic marker for patients with rectal cancer.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1