arXiv (Cornell University) · 2018 · 12 citations · 57 references
EngineeringSingle QubitQuantum ComputingQuantum Optimization AlgorithmQuantum Machine LearningQuantum EntanglementApproximation TheoryLow-rank ApproximationQuantum ScienceClifford AlgebraQuantum AlgorithmComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceRandomized BenchmarkingClifford OperatorsRandomized Benchmarking AlgorithmRandom MatrixQuantum BenchmarkingQuantum Error CorrectionQuantum Algorithms
Randomized benchmarking is an experimental procedure intended to demonstrate control of quantum systems. The procedure extracts the average error introduced by a set of control operations. When the target set of operations is intended to be the set of Clifford operators, the randomized benchmarking algorithm is particularly easy to perform and its results have an important interpretation with respect to quantum computation. The aim of the benchmark is to provide a simple, useful parameter describing the quality of quantum control with an experiment that can be performed in a standard way on any prospective quantum computer. This parameter can be used to fairly compare different experiments or to mark improvement in a single experiment. In this thesis I discuss first the original randomized-benchmarking procedure and the importance of the Clifford operators for its implementation. I develop the statistical analysis of the results and the physical assumptions that are required for the simplest analysis to apply. The original procedure does not extend in an obvious way to benchmarking of more than one qubit, so I introduce a standardized procedure for randomized benchmarking that applies to any number of qubits. This new procedure also enables the benchmarking of an individual control operation. I describe two randomized-benchmarking experiments I helped to design: one involved a single qubit and utilized a variation of the original procedure and the second involved two qubits and demonstrated the new procedure. I conclude with several potential extensions to the original and new procedures that give them reduced experimental overhead, the ability to describe encoded operations, and fairer comparisons between experiments.
57
Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation
Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern et al. · Reviews of Modern Physics · 2008 · 6.7K citations · Full text
Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer
D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, D. J. Wineland · Nature · 2002 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits
Scott Aaronson, Daniel Gottesman · Physical Review A · 2004 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas
Sergey Bravyi, Alexei Kitaev · Physical Review A · 2005 · 1.4K citations · Full text