Sensors · 2020 · 129 citations · 58 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine VisionRemote SensingDeep LearningImage ClassificationImage SegmentationObject DetectionObject RecognitionSemantic SegmentationAerial Image SegmentationClassification AccuracyClassification Accuracy AssessmentConditional Random FieldsConvolutional Neural Network SegmentationConvolutional Neural NetworksFully Convolutional NetworksPost-processing
This study proposes and evaluates five deep fully convolutional networks (FCNs) for the semantic segmentation of a single tree species: SegNet, U-Net, FC-DenseNet, and two DeepLabv3+ variants. The performance of the FCN designs is evaluated experimentally in terms of classification accuracy and computational load. We also verify the benefits of fully connected conditional random fields (CRFs) as a post-processing step to improve the segmentation maps. The analysis is conducted on a set of images captured by an RGB camera aboard a UAV flying over an urban area. The dataset also contains a mask that indicates the occurrence of an endangered species called Dipteryx alata Vogel, also known as cumbaru, taken as the species to be identified. The experimental analysis shows the effectiveness of each design and reports average overall accuracy ranging from 88.9% to 96.7%, an F1-score between 87.0% and 96.1%, and IoU from 77.1% to 92.5%. We also realize that CRF consistently improves the performance, but at a high computational cost.
58
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens van der Maaten et al. · 2017 · 44.7K citations
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, Trevor Darrell · 2015 · 36.9K citations
Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár et al. · 2017 · 28.8K citations
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu et al. · 2018 · 25.4K citations
Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Iasonas Kokkinos et al. · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2017 · 22.1K citations