2019 · 33 citations · 21 references
ComputingComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceComputer SecurityEmbedded SystemsHardware SecurityEmbedded SecurityEmbedded System SecurityHardware ObfuscationPhysical Unclonable FunctionsSide-channel AnalysisSide-channel AttacksArbiter Physical Unclonable FunctionsChallenge-response Pair GenerationElectronic Physical Unclonable FunctionsMachine-learning AttacksPhysically Unclonable FunctionsSilicon Physical Unclonable FunctionsStrong Physical Unclonable FunctionsWeak Physical Unclonable Functions
Communication security is essential for the proper functioning of the Internet of Things. Traditional approaches that rely on cryptographic keys are vulnerable to side-channel attacks. Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs), leveraging unavoidable and irreproducible variations of integrated circuits to produce responses unique for individual PUF devices, are emerging as promising candidates as security primitives to provide keyless solutions. Before a PUF can be adopted for real applications, the PUF must be thoroughly examined to understand its various properties for its application feasibility. In this paper, we study XOR PUFs for broad ranges of values for circuit architecture parameters. XOR PUFs have been extensively studied, and have been shown to be unable to withstand machine learning attacks for 64-bit XOR PUFs with less than ten component PUFs. Attack methods employed in existing studies need a large number of challenge-response pairs (CRPs), which are obtainable only if the PUF has an open access interface. When PUF-embedded devices equipped with mutual authentication or response obfuscating techniques, it is difficult for attackers to accumulate large numbers of CRPs. With only a small number of accumulated CRPs available to attackers, small size PUFs, like XOR PUFs with a small number of component PUFs and stages, may become resistant to machine learning attacks. Since smaller sizes mean less resource-demanding, it is worthwhile to examine such PUFs which have usually been considered unsafe against attacks. Such are thoughts that have been motivating us in this paper to explore the PUF performances for a wide range of values of the PUF architecture parameters.
21
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Ravikanth Pappu, Ben Recht, Jason Taylor et al. · Science · 2002 · 2K citations · Full text
Silicon physical random functions
Blaise Gassend, Dwaine Clarke, Marten van Dijk et al. · 2002 · 1.6K citations
Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering +17
Physical Unclonable Functions and Applications: A Tutorial
Charles Herder, Meng-Day Yu, Farinaz Koushanfar et al. · Proceedings of the IEEE · 2014 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Modeling attacks on physical unclonable functions
Ulrich Rührmair, Frank Sehnke, Jan Sölter et al. · 2010 · 1K citations · Full text