Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Working with Indigenous, local and scientific knowledge in assessments of nature and nature’s linkages with people

342

Citations

57

References

2020

Year

TLDR

Indigenous and local knowledge is essential for inclusive nature assessments, yet indigenous sustainability concepts differ from dominant discourses, prompting IPBES to foster global dialogue across knowledge systems. The study presents and analyzes an IPBES ILK Approach that supports indigenous rights, care, community strengthening, and knowledge exchange in nature assessments. The 2017 IPBES ILK Approach includes procedures for assessing nature linkages, a participatory mechanism, and institutional arrangements to incorporate indigenous peoples and local communities. Customary institutions, empowering dialogues, and shared governance are key capacities that enable inclusion of diverse sustainability concepts in assessments.

Abstract

Working with indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is vital for inclusive assessments of nature and nature's linkages with people. Indigenous peoples' concepts about what constitutes sustainability, for example, differ markedly from dominant sustainability discourses. The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services (IPBES) is promoting dialogue across different knowledge systems globally. In 2017, member states of IPBES adopted an ILK Approach including: procedures for assessments of nature and nature's linkages with people; a participatory mechanism; and institutional arrangements for including indigenous peoples and local communities. We present this Approach and analyse how it supports ILK in IPBES assessments through: respecting rights; supporting care and mutuality; strengthening communities and their knowledge systems; and supporting knowledge exchange. Customary institutions that ensure the integrity of ILK, effective empowering dialogues, and shared governance are among critical capacities that enable inclusion of diverse conceptualizations of sustainability in assessments.

References

YearCitations

Page 1