Publication | Open Access
An Optimization Approach Considering User Utility for the PV-Storage Charging Station Planning Process
18
Citations
13
References
2020
Year
EngineeringHome Energy StorageVirtual Power PlantPhotovoltaic SystemPhotovoltaicsOptimal System DesignEnergy OptimizationSystems EngineeringOptimization ModelBi-level Optimization ModelRenewable Energy SystemsEnergy Demand ManagementLinear OptimizationElectrical EngineeringSolar PowerPower System OptimizationEnergy StorageInteger ProgrammingSmart GridEnergy ManagementRooftop PhotovoltaicsEnergy Economics
Based on the comprehensive utilization of energy storage, photovoltaic power generation, and intelligent charging piles, photovoltaic (PV)-storage charging stations can provide green energy for electric vehicles (EVs), which can significantly improve the green level of the transportation industry. However, there are many challenges in the PV-storage charging station planning process, making it theoretically and practically significant to study approaches to planning. This paper promotes a bi-level optimization planning approach for PV-storage charging stations. First, taking PV-storage charging stations and EV users as the upper- and lower-level problems, respectively, during the planning process, a bi-level optimization model for PV-storage charging stations considering user utility is established for capacity allocation and user behavior-based electricity pricing. Second, the model is converted into a single-level mixed-integer linear programming model using the piecewise linear utility function, Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions, and linearization methods. Finally, to verify the validity of the proposed model and the solution algorithm, a commercial solver is used to solve the optimization model and obtain the planning scheme. The results show that the proposed bi-level optimization model can provide a more economical and reasonable planning scheme than the single-level model, and can reduce the investment cost by 8.84%, operation and maintenance cost by 13.23%, and increase net revenue by 5.11%.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1