Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · 2020 · 13 citations · 23 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryOrthopedic BiomaterialsReconstructive SurgeryTissue EngineeringDistraction RateHard Tissue ReconstructionSoft Tissue ReconstructionAcellular Dermal Matrix GraftAcetabular CoverageAcetabular Deficiency ReconstructionBiomechanical ResponseBiomechanical Stress ResponseCapsular MechanicsHip Reconstruction
PURPOSE: To quantify the biomechanical properties of the hip capsule with human dermal allograft reconstruction to determine whether a dermal patch restored capsular resistance to distraction. METHODS: Nine cadaveric hip specimens were dissected until capsule and bony structures remained and were then mounted in a testing fixture in neutral flexion and abduction. Four states of the hip capsule were sequentially tested under axial distraction of 5 mm measured with video analysis and with resultant force measurement: (1) intact hip capsule, (2) interportal capsulotomy, (3) capsulectomy to the zona orbicularis, and (4) capsular reconstruction with human dermal allograft using acetabular anchors and capsule-to-patch sutures. RESULTS: Capsulectomy was different from intact (P = .036), capsulotomy differed from capsulectomy (P = .012), and the repair was statistically significantly different from capsulectomy (P = .042); intact and reconstructed cases were not statistically significantly different. The force required for 5 mm of distraction decreased after interportal capsulotomy by an average of 9% compared with the intact state and further decreased after capsulectomy by 30% compared with the intact state. After capsular reconstruction using dermal allograft, force requirements increased by an average of 36% from the capsulectomy state, only 5% below the intact state. CONCLUSIONS: Human dermal allograft tissue graft provides restoration of distractive strength for use during hip capsule reconstruction with acetabular anchor fixation and distal soft-tissue fixation after capsulectomy in a cadaveric model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Capsular repair or reconstruction with a dermal patch offers time-zero restoration of function; intact and reconstructed cases showed no difference, and reconstruction restored a capsulectomy to a biomechanical equivalent of the intact case when distraction was applied.
23
Rachel M. Frank, Simon Lee, Charles A. Bush‐Joseph et al. · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2014 · 342 citations