Journal of Parkinson s Disease · 2019 · 41 citations · 41 references
MedicinePhysical MedicineRehabilitation MedicineMobility RehabilitationPhysical TherapyRehabilitationBalance RehabilitationBalance TrainingGait TrainingParkinson DiseaseParkinson Disease RehabilitationParkinsonian DisordersAuditory CuesLinear Mixed ModelsParkinson's Disease RehabilitationParkinson’s Disease RehabilitationParkinson’s Disease TreatmentRandomized Clinical TrialsRhythmic Auditory CueingTraining
BACKGROUND: Balance impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) improves only partially with dopaminergic medication. Therefore, non-pharmacological interventions such as physiotherapy are important elements in clinical management. External cues are often applied to improve gait, but their effects on balance control are unclear. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial to study the effectiveness of balance training with and without rhythmical auditory cues. We screened 201 volunteers by telephone; 154 were assigned randomly into three groups: (1) multimodal balance training supported by rhythmical auditory stimuli (n = 56) (RAS-supported multimodal balance training); (2) regular multimodal balance training without rhythmical auditory stimuli (n = 50); and (3) control intervention involving a general education program (n = 48). Training was performed for 5 weeks, two times/week. Linear mixed models were used for all outcomes. Primary outcome was the Mini-BESTest (MBEST) score immediately after the training period. Assessments were performed by a single, blinded assessor at baseline, immediately post intervention, and after one and 6-months follow-up. RESULTS: Immediately post intervention, RAS-supported multimodal balance training was more effective than regular multimodal balance training on MBEST (difference 3.5 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.2; 4.8)), p < 0.001). Patients allocated to both active interventions improved compared to controls (MBEST estimated mean difference versus controls 6.6 (CI 5.2; 8.0), p < 0.001 for RAS-supported multimodal balance training; and 3.0 (CI 2.7; 5.3), p < 0.001 for regular multimodal balance training). Improvements were retained at one-month follow-up for both active interventions, but only the RAS-supported multimodal balance training group maintained its improvement at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Both RAS-supported multimodal balance training and regular multimodal balance training improve balance, but RAS-supported multimodal balance training-adding rhythmical auditory cues to regular multimodal balance training-has greater and more sustained effects.
41
Margaret M. Hoehn, Melvin D. Yahr · Neurology · 1967 · 12K citations · Full text
Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument.
Katherine Berg, Sharon Wood-Dauphinée, Jack I. Williams et al. · PubMed · 1993 · 2.9K citations
Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)
Lucy Yardley, Nina Beyer, Klaus Hauer et al. · Age and Ageing · 2005 · 2.1K citations · Full text