Publication | Open Access
How Does Disagreement Benefit Co-teaching?
23
Citations
0
References
2019
Year
Artificial IntelligenceEngineeringMachine LearningEducational PsychologyEducationCommunicationTeaching MethodTeacher EducationData ScienceSelf-supervised LearningClassroom PracticeSemi-supervised LearningSupervised LearningLearning SciencesComputer ScienceDeep LearningRobust Learning ParadigmDoes DisagreementDeep Neural NetworksKnowledge DistillationTeachingCooperative LearningNoisy Labels
Learning with noisy labels is one of the hottest problems in weakly-supervised learning. Based on memorization effects of deep neural networks, training on small-loss instances becomes very promising for handling noisy labels. This fosters the state-of-the-art approach that cross-trains two deep neural networks using the small-loss trick. However, with the increase of epochs, two networks converge to a consensus and Co-teaching reduces to the self-training MentorNet. To tackle this issue, we propose a robust learning paradigm called Co-teaching+, which bridges the Update by Disagreement strategy with the original Co-teaching. First, two networks feed forward and predict all data, but keep prediction disagreement data only. Then, among such disagreement data, each network selects its small-loss data, but back propagates the small-loss data from its peer network and updates its own parameters. Empirical results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that Co-teaching+ is much superior to many state-of-the-art methods in the robustness of trained models.