Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study

In‐Soo Kim, Byounghyun Lim, Jaemin Shim, Minki Hwang, Hee Tae Yu, Tae‐Hoon Kim, Jae‐Sun Uhm, Sung‐Hwan Kim, Boyoung Joung, Young Keun On,

Frontiers in Physiology · 2019 · 28 citations · 29 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Objective: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. Methods: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persistent AF (77.8% men, age 60.8±9.9 years) to the computational modeling-guided ablation group (53 patients) and the empirical ablation group (55 patients) based on the operators’ experience. For virtual ablation, four virtual linear and one electrogram-guided lesion sets were tested on patient heart computed tomogram-based models, and the lesion set with the fastest termination time was reported to the operator in the modeling-guided ablation group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting longer than 30 seconds after a single procedure. Results: During 31.5±9.4 months, virtual ablation procedures were available in 95.2% of the patients (108/118). Clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after a modeling-guided ablation than after an empirical ablation (20.8% vs. 40.0%, log-rank p=0.042). Modeling-guided ablation was independently associated with a better long-term rhythm outcome of persistent AF ablation (HR=0.29 [0.12-0.69], p=0.005). The rhythm outcome of the modeling-guided ablation showed better trends in males, non-obese patients with a less remodeled atrium (left atrial dimension<50mm), ejection fraction≥50%, and those without hypertension or diabetes (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for the total procedure time (p=0.403), ablation time (p=0.510), and major complication rate (p=0.900). Conclusions: Among patients with persistent AF, the computational modeling-guided ablation was superior to the empirical catheter ablation regarding the rhythm outcome. Trial registration: This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02171364.

References

29