Burst-like conditioning electrical stimulation is more efficacious than continuous stimulation for inducing secondary hyperalgesia in humans

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of burst-like conditioning electrical stimulation vs. continuous stimulation of cutaneous nociceptors for inducing increased pinprick sensitivity in the surrounding unstimulated skin (a phenomenon referred to as secondary hyperalgesia). In a first experiment ( n = 30), we compared the increase in mechanical pinprick sensitivity induced by 50-Hz burst-like stimulation ( n = 15) vs. 5-Hz continuous stimulation ( n = 15) while maintaining constant the total number of stimuli and the total duration of stimulation. We found a significantly greater increase in mechanical pinprick sensitivity in the surrounding unstimulated skin after 50-Hz burst-like stimulation compared with 5-Hz continuous stimulation ( P = 0.013, Cohen’s d = 0.970). Importantly, to control for the different frequency of stimulation, we compared in a second experiment ( n = 40) 5-Hz continuous stimulation ( n = 20) vs. 5-Hz burst-like stimulation ( n = 20), this time while keeping the total number of stimuli as well as the frequency of stimulation identical. Again, we found a significantly greater increase in pinprick sensitivity after 5-Hz burst-like stimulation compared with 5-Hz continuous stimulation ( P = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.868). To conclude, our data indicate that burst-like conditioning electrical stimulation is more efficacious than continuous stimulation for inducing secondary hyperalgesia. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Burst-like electrical conditioning stimulation of cutaneous nociceptors is more efficacious than continuous stimulation for inducing heterosynaptic facilitation of mechanical nociceptive input in humans.