Sugar Industry · 2012 · 42 citations · 11 references
ManagementEnvironmental PolicyCarbon ManagementEnvironmental EconomicsLand Use PolicyBiomass ConversionCarbon Footprint AssessmentCarbon FootprintingCarbon Stock EstimationGreenhouse Gas AccountingLand-use EconomicsEfficiency ComparisonFood System Environmental Footprint AssessmentInput-output Carbon FootprintingLand-use Change EmissionsLand-use Emissions AccountingProduct Carbon Footprint AssessmentProduct Footprint AccountingProduction-based Carbon Footprinting
The calculations made to obtain the PCF of EU white sugar from sugar beet have revealed that the results are extremely sensitive to methodological choices and this article provides some recommendations in that regard. A comparison of EU beet sugar with two examples of raw cane sugar imported and refined in the EU, showed that the PCF range for EU refined cane sugar is on average similar, if not higher (642–760 kg CO2eq/t sugar) than the total methodological PCF range for the EU beet sugar average case (242–771 kg CO2eq/t sugar). A review of the published literature revealed, on the one hand, that land use change emissions for cane sugar can be very significant but are rarely taken into account, and on the other hand, that overseas transport and refining adds a significant amount of emissions to the PCF of raw cane sugar imported into the EU. An overall land use efficiency comparison between cane and beet production systems also concluded that significantly more land (51%) is required by cane systems to produce an equivalent set of products (sugar and co-products) with an equivalent amount of GHG emissions. Finally, the limitations of PCFs as a tool to evaluate the overall environmental sustainability of EU beet sugar were also analysed
11
Hans-Jürgen Klüppel · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · 2005 · 4.6K citations
Management, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Management +12