Ecological Applications · 2019 · 68 citations · 38 references
Life SciencesEcologyEntomologyInsect EcologyPlant EcologyRestoration EcologyInsect Functional DiversityPlant-pollinator InteractionsPollination BiologyPollination NetworksPollinator DiversityPollinator MonitoringBee DiversityFunctional Species GroupsPlant Functional GroupsPlant-pollinator Foraging InteractionsPollinator EcologyPollinator Functional DiversityPollinator InteractionsPollinator Recovery
Wild pollinators are necessary for ensuring plant reproduction, not only among crop fields but also remnant and restored ecosystems. Restoration activities should, therefore, lead to wild pollinator recovery, and thus be monitored to evaluate effects on pollinator diversity and functionality. We assessed bee pollinator functional responses in restoration plantings by creating functional groups (traits: body size, nesting location, sociality, and foraging strategy), comparing their abundance and diversity to that of other habitats (i.e., conserved and degraded primary forest fragments, anthropogenic wetlands, and sugarcane fields), and testing for an effect of source habitat (i.e., primary forest fragments) isolation. We analyzed functional effects on pollen transportation by identifying the pollen grains attached on the bodies of bees; creating plant functional groups with the identified species (traits: habit, successional class, geographic origin, and pollination mode); comparing their frequency, diversity, and interaction network structure among habitats; and searching for key interactions in network modules. In general, the abundance and diversity of bee communities and the frequency and diversity of the interacting plant species in restoration plantings were lower than those in primary forest fragments but higher than those in anthropogenic wetlands and sugarcane fields, suggesting that restoration plantings better enhance bee community recovery and functionality than other disturbed habitats. The interacting bees and plants were also negatively affected by habitat isolation, demonstrating the importance of primary forest fragments to supply bee populations to restored sites. The structure of interaction networks was little affected by habitat change and isolation, but the composition and diversity of functional groups varied significantly. There were more effects on larger bee species with more restricted nesting and floral requirements, and the woody species with which they interact most frequently. We identified key functional groups of bee pollinators that deserve priority for conservation because they play an important role in the pollen transportation of some the most relevant species in remnant forests and restoration plantings and also respond more negatively to habitat disturbances. Restoration efforts should include provisioning of nesting resources and management and conservation of primary forest remnant fragments that represent source habitats for them.
38
Let the concept of trait be functional!
Cyrille Violle, Marie‐Laure Navas, Denis Vile et al. · Oikos · 2007 · 4.6K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +9
The modularity of pollination networks
Jens M. Olesen, Jordi Bascompte, Yoko Luise Dupont et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +15
Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition
W. N. Venables, B. D. Ripley · 2002 · 2.5K citations
Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size
Sarah S. Greenleaf, Neal M. Williams, Rachael Winfree et al. · Oecologia · 2007 · 1.8K citations
Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks
Carsten F. Dormann, Jochen Fründ, Nico Blüthgen et al. · The Open Ecology Journal · 2009 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +16