Remote Sensing · 2019 · 43 citations · 38 references
Earth ObservationEngineeringGeomorphologyMassive Shallow LandslidesEarthquake HazardsDisaster DetectionEarth ScienceGeophysicsCoherence InformationImaging RadarSatellite ImagingGeodesySynthetic Aperture RadarRapid MappingGeographySeismic ImagingRadar ApplicationRadarPixel LevelLandslide MappingSeismologyDigital PhotogrammetryRemote SensingRadar Image Processing
A rapid mapping of landslides following a disaster is important for coordinating emergency response and limiting rescue delays. A synthetic aperture radar (SAR) can provide a solution even in harsh weather and at night, due to its independence of weather and light, quick response, no contact and broad coverage. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive exploration on the intensity and coherence information of three Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2) SAR images, for rapid massive landslide mapping in a pixel level, in order to provide a reference for future applications. Applied data were two pre-event and one post-event high-resolution ALOS-2 products. Studied area was in the east of Iburi, Hokkaido, Japan, where massive shallow landslides were triggered in the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake. Potential parameters, including intensity difference (d), co-event correlation coefficient (r), correlation coefficient difference ( ∆ r ), co-event coherence ( γ ), and coherence difference ( ∆ γ ), were first selected and calculated based on a radar reflection mechanism, to facilitate rapid detection. Qualitative observation was then performed by overlapping ground truth landslides to calculated parameter images. Based on qualitative observation, an absolute value of d ( d a b s 1 ) was applied to facility analyses, and a new parameter ( d a b s 2 ) was proposed to avoid information loss in the calculation. After that, quantitative analyses of the six parameters ( d a b s 1 , d a b s 2 , r, ∆ r , γ and ∆ γ ) were performed by receiver operating characteristic. d a b s 2 and ∆ r were found to be favorable parameters, which had the highest AUC values of 0.82 and 0.75, and correctly classified 69.36% and 64.57% landslide and non-landslide pixels by appropriate thresholds. Finally, a discriminant function was developed, combining three relatively favorable parameters ( d a b s 2 , ∆ r , and ∆ γ ) with one in each type, and achieved an overall accuracy of 74.31% for landslide mapping.
38
An introduction to ROC analysis
Tom Fawcett · Pattern Recognition Letters · 2005 · 20.5K citations
Index for rating diagnostic tests
W. J. Youden · Cancer · 1950 · 11.1K citations · Full text
Basic principles of ROC analysis
Charles E. Metz · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · 1978 · 6K citations