In Vitro Research Reproducibility: Keeping Up High Standards

Cordula Hirsch, Stefan Schildknecht

Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2019 · 161 citations · 60 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Reproducibility concerns in life‑science research, especially after preclinical in‑vivo failures, have prompted a shift toward increasingly popular in‑vitro cell‑based models, yet guidance on cell handling is inconsistently adopted across biomedical fields. The authors aim to establish and promote high reproducibility standards in in‑vitro biomedical research and to raise awareness among life‑science scientists of their responsibility to uphold these standards. They compiled a list of routine in‑vitro cell‑culture steps that most affect cell quality and recommend cost‑effective practices to reduce the risk of poor quality compromising reproducibility. The recommendations show that modest time and resource investments can reduce the risk of poor cell quality undermining reproducibility.

Abstract

Concern regarding the reproducibility of observations in life science research has emerged in recent years, particularly in view of unfavorable experiences with preclinical in vivo research. The use of cell-based systems has increasingly replaced in vivo research and the application of in vitro models enjoys an ever-growing popularity. To avoid repeating past mistakes, high standards of reproducibility and reliability must be established and maintained in the field of in vitro biomedical research. Detailed guidance documenting the appropriate handling of cells has been authored but was received with quite disparate perception by different branches in biomedical research. In that regard, we intend to raise awareness of the reproducibility issue among scientists in all branches of contemporary life science research and their individual responsibility in this matter. We have herein compiled a selection of the most susceptible steps of everyday in vitro cell culture routines that have the potential to influence cell quality and recommend practices to minimize the likelihood of poor cell quality impairing reproducibility with modest investment of time and resources.

References

60