BMJ Quality & Safety · 2019 · 36 citations · 22 references
MedicinePopulation Health SciencesPreventive MedicineCancer PreventionCancer ScreeningWomen's HealthCervical CancerColorectal CancerPopulation ScreeningScreeningStudy DesignBarriers To Screening UptakeCervical Cancer ScreeningCervical Carcinoma ScreeningColorectal Cancer ScreeningScreening Participation RatesScreening Uptake Disparities
BACKGROUND: In Scotland, the uptake of clinic-based breast (72%) and cervical (77%) screening is higher than home-based colorectal screening (~60%). To inform new approaches to increase uptake of colorectal screening, we compared the perceptions of colorectal screening among women with different screening histories. METHODS: We purposively sampled women with different screening histories to invite to semistructured interviews: (1) participated in all; (2) participated in breast and cervical but not colorectal ('colorectal-specific non-participants'); (3) participated in none. To identify the sample we linked the data for all women eligible for all three screening programmes in Glasgow, Scotland (aged 51-64 years; n=68 324). Interviews covered perceptions of cancer, screening and screening decisions. Framework method was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2924 women invited, 86 expressed an interest, and 59 were interviewed. The three groups' perceptions differed, with the colorectal-specific non-participants expressing that: (1) treatment for colorectal cancer is more severe than for breast or cervical cancer; (2) colorectal symptoms are easier to self-detect than breast or cervical symptoms; (3) they worried about completing the test incorrectly; and (4) the colorectal test could be more easily delayed or forgotten than breast or cervical screening. CONCLUSION: Our comparative approach suggested targets for future interventions to increase colorectal screening uptake including: (1) reducing fear of colorectal cancer treatments; (2) increasing awareness that screening is for the asymptomatic; (3) increasing confidence to self-complete the test; and (4) providing a suggested deadline and/or additional reminders.
22
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally MacIntyre et al. · BMJ · 2008 · 11.4K citations · Full text
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Gary F. Moore, Suzanne Audrey, Mary Barker et al. · BMJ · 2015 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Health Policy, Comparative Effectiveness Research +9