Medical Physics · 2019 · 23 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyOptimizationRadiation DosimetryTreatment PlanningDose PrescriptionIntensity-modulated RadiotherapyPatient Dose OptimizationPlan OptimizationRadiation Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning PhysicsAutomated Treatment PlanningNonconvex OptimizationObjective Function FormulationRadiation Dose ConstraintsRadiotherapy Dose PlanningThresholdsTreatment Plan OptimizationTreatment Planning Optimization
PURPOSE: Dose-volume constraints (DVCs) continue to be common features in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) prescriptions, but they are non-convex and difficult to incorporate. We propose computationally efficient methods to incorporate dose-volume constraints (DVCs) into automated IMRT planning. METHODS: We propose a two-phase approach: in phase-1, we solve a convex approximation with DVCs. Although this convex approximation does not guarantee DVC satisfaction, it provides crucial initial information about voxels likely to receive doses below DVC thresholds. Subsequently, phase-2 solves an optimization problem with maximum dose constraints imposed on those subthreshold voxels. We further categorize DVCs into hard- and soft-DVCs, where hard-DVCs are strictly enforced by the optimization and soft-DVCs are encouraged in the objective function. We tested this approach in our automated treatment planning system which is based on hierarchical constrained optimization. Performance is demonstrated on a series of paraspinal, lung, oligometastasis, and prostate cases as well as a small paraspinal case for which we can computationally afford to obtain a ground-truth by solving a non-convex optimization problem. RESULTS: The proposed algorithm successfully meets all the hard-DVCs while increasing the overall computational time of the baseline planning process (without DVCs) by 20%, 10%, and 11% for paraspinal, oligometastasis, and prostate cases, respectively. For a soft-DVC applied to the lung case, the dose-volume histogram curve moves toward the desired direction and the computational time is increased by 11%. For a low-resolution paraspinal case, the ground-truth solution process using mixed-integer programming methods required 15 h while the proposed algorithm converges in only 2 min with a proximal solution. CONCLUSIONS: A computationally tractable algorithm to handle hard- and soft-DVCs is developed which is capable of satisfying DVCs without any parameter tweaking. Although the algorithm is demonstrated in our in-house developed automated treatment planning system, it can potentially be used in any constrained optimization framework.
25
Predicting dose‐volume histograms for organs‐at‐risk in IMRT planning
L. Appenzoller, Jeff M. Michalski, Wade L. Thorstad et al. · Medical Physics · 2012 · 383 citations
Binbin Wu, Francesco Ricchetti, Giuseppe Sanguineti et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2010 · 264 citations
Optimizing the Delivery of Radiation Therapy to Cancer Patients
David Shepard, Michael C. Ferris, G Olivera et al. · SIAM Review · 1999 · 256 citations · Full text