Cambridge Review of International Affairs · 2019 · 17 citations · 63 references
Social SciencesInternational RelationsPolitical ScienceGlobal GovernancePolitical InstitutionsPolitical SociologyChinese StudiesInternational CooperationPolitical OrderGlobal NormsInternational NormsLiberal International OrderPluralist PhilosophyWorld Order
Debates on China’s engagement with international institutions centre on a (false) dichotomy that China is either a status-quo or revisionist power. Both sides of this debate have ample empirical evidence to support their arguments and they tend towards conclusions that China’s behaviour and preferences lie in the space in between these two positions. It is important to consider how China presents a contest to international order from with international institutions.This article examines the question: What is China being socialised into? Drawing on the international practices literature, this paper unpacks the types of norms that China may be being socialised into. It makes the argument that China has been successfully socialised into the practices of international institutions – the ways the bureaucracies work and can be used to achieve political goals – and pluralist-liberal global norms, but incompletely into solidarist liberal norms.
63
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
Humanities, History, Physics +17
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Howard Sankey · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · 2002 · 1.9K citations
An Evolutionary Approach to Norms
Robert Axelrod · American Political Science Review · 1986 · 1.4K citations