IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019 · 38 citations · 16 references
EngineeringManufacturing EngineeringAdditive ManufacturingManufacturing ProcessesProduction Engineering3D PrintingDesign For Additive ManufacturingAccuracyAdditive Manufacturing Surface QualityDeposition ModelingDimensional StabilitySlicer SoftwareSurface Quality ImprovementSurface Quality MetricsThree-dimensional Printing
Abstract This study aims to compare the accuracy offered by 3D Slicer Software in printing end-use parts inside a Fused Deposition Modeling process of Additive Manufacturing. The purpose, in particular, is to investigate the surface quality and the dimensional stability of the manufactured parts comparing the effect of selecting a different 3D Slicer tool among Simplify3D, Cura and Slic3r 3D. With this scope, parts were produced using these process tools while results were analysed in terms of accuracy, production time and consumption of material. Results, graphically and visually presented, show significant differences in the dimensional and surface accuracy with an optimum outcome offered by the Simplify3D as best 3D slicer tool. The Simplify3D slicer has essential advantages in printed end-use parts because creates the 3D models with significantly better accuracy and quality support.
16
Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications
Tetsuo Tomiyama, Peng Gu, Yan Jin et al. · CIRP Annals · 2009 · 386 citations
Arts, Design, Educational Technology +14