Publication | Open Access
Proper Attribution for Curation and Maintenance of Research Collections: Metadata Recommendations of the RDA/TDWG Working Group
22
Citations
0
References
2019
Year
EngineeringEnvironmental Impact AssessmentData CurationMetadataData PublishingResearch EthicsSemantic WebJournalismData ScienceManagementData IntegrationData ManagementProfessional RewardMetadata IntegrationProper AttributionMetadata ManagementResearch CollectionsResearch Data ManagementResearch Data ArchivingMeta DataRda/tdwg Working GroupAttribution MetadataMetadata SchemaData Modeling
Research collections are an important tool for understanding the Earth, its systems, and human interaction. Despite the importance of collections, many are not maintained or curated as thoroughly as we would like. Part of the reason for this is the lack of professional reward for collection, curation, or maintenance. To address this gap in attribution metadata, the Research Data Alliance (RDA) and the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) organization co-endorsed a Working Group to create recommendations for the representation of attribution metadata. After 18 months, this Working Group recommended the use of PROV entities and properties to link people (Agent), the curatorial actions they perform (Activity), and the digital or physical objects they are curating (Entity). Assigning a Role to an Agent is optional. These recommendations are discussed in the context of the RDA, TDWG, and existing standards. Future work includes adapting these recommendations to the specific needs of TDWG and developing a pilot application in collaboration with ORCID and the Data Futures project.