International Journal of Neural Systems · 2019 · 76 citations · 39 references
ComputingComputer ScienceNeuroscienceFeature EngineeringMachine LearningNeural EngineeringBrain-computer InterfacesElectroencephalogram AnalysisElectroencephalographyTransfer TrainingBrain-computer Interface ClassificationBrain-computer Interface Signal ProcessingClassification Algorithms For Brain-computer InterfacesEmpirical Mode DecompositionEmpirical Mode Decomposition FeaturesMotor Imagery AnalysisMotor Imagery ClassificationRiemannian Metric
The performance of a brain–computer interface (BCI) will generally improve by increasing the volume of training data on which it is trained. However, a classifier’s generalization ability is often negatively affected when highly non-stationary data are collected across both sessions and subjects. The aim of this work is to reduce the long calibration time in BCI systems by proposing a transfer learning model which can be used for evaluating unseen single trials for a subject without the need for training session data. A method is proposed which combines a generalization of the previously proposed subject-specific “multivariate empirical-mode decomposition” preprocessing technique by taking a fixed band of 8–30[Formula: see text]Hz for all four motor imagery tasks and a novel classification model which exploits the structure of tangent space features drawn from the Riemannian geometry framework, that is shared among the training data of multiple sessions and subjects. Results demonstrate comparable performance improvement across multiple subjects without subject-specific calibration, when compared with other state-of-the-art techniques.
39
Norden E. Huang, Steven Long, Man‐Li C. Wu et al. · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 1998 · 23.3K citations · Full text
Computing, Computational Engineering, Biomedical Signal Processing +16
Boosting for transfer learning
Wenyuan Dai, Qiang Yang, Gui-Rong Xue et al. · 2007 · 1.7K citations