Comparison of the 3D triple-scan protocol and the impression replica technique for 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study was to compare the fit measurements from the 3 D triple-scan protocol and the impression replica technique, by measuring the fit of three-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. <b>Materials and methods:</b> The results from an earlier study using the triple-scan protocol were compared to results from the impression replica technique for absolute marginal gap, cervical area gap and internal gap. <b>Results:</b> There were no differences for cervical area gap or internal gap, but for absolute marginal gap the impression replica technique obtained significantly smaller fit values. <b>Conclusion:</b> The impression replica technique and the triple-scan protocol may both be used to measure the fit of tooth-supported restorations. However, the scanner used for the triple-scan protocol must be able to obtain scan points at the outermost edge of the restorations when used for absolute marginal gap.