Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2019 · 30 citations · 34 references
Life SciencesImmunologyOncologyCancer ImmunologyImmunotherapyTumor ImmunologyCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune CheckpointsImmuno-oncology BiomarkersTumor-infiltrating LymphocytesCd8+ Tumor-infiltrating LymphocytesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor BiomarkersMelanoma ImmunotherapyPd-l1 BlockadeProgrammed Cell Death Protein 1 (Pd-1) PathwayProgrammed Death-1 InhibitionProgrammed Death-ligand 1 BiomarkerTherapeutic Response Prediction
Abstract Background Recent advances obtained with immune checkpoint inhibitors ( ICI s) targeting the programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1) protein have significantly improved the outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma. The PD ‐L1 expression in tumour cells as detected by immunohistochemistry is a predictive biomarker in some solid tumours, but appears insufficient as prognostic or predictive factor of response to ICI s in metastatic melanomas. Objectives We investigated whether the presence and the features of pretreatment CD 8 + tumour‐infiltrating T lymphocytes ( TIL s) could be a complementary prognostic or predictive biomarker in patients with metastatic melanoma. Methods In this retrospective study, we evaluated the association of PD ‐L1 expression ≥5% of tumour cells combined with TIL features ( CD 8, CD 28, Ki67) with the overall survival ( OS ) among 51 patients treated with ICI s and 54 patients treated with other treatment options (non‐ ICI s). Results PD ‐L1 positivity was observed in 33% and 39% of primary melanomas and matched metastases, respectively, with, however, poor concordance between the primary and the matched metastatic site (κ = 0.283). No significant association was noted between PD ‐L1 expression and CD8 + TIL profile analysed as single markers and OS or response to immunotherapy. Instead, their combined analysis in primary melanoma samples showed that the PD ‐L1−/ CD 8 + status was significantly associated with prolonged OS in the whole population ( P = 0.04) and in the subgroup treated with non‐ ICI s ( P = 0.009). Conversely, the PD ‐L1+/ CD 8 + status was a good prognostic factor in patients treated with ICI s ( P = 0.022), whereas was significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients treated with non‐ ICI s ( P = 0.014). While the expression of CD 28 was not related to outcome, the Ki67 expression was significantly associated with poor OS in the subgroup CD 8 + TIL +/ PD ‐L1− ( P = 0.02). Conclusions The pretreatment combination of PD ‐L1 expression with the level of CD 8 + TIL s could better assess OS and predict therapeutic response of patients with metastatic melanoma treated by either immunotherapy or other treatment regimens.
34
Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in Cancer
Suzanne L. Topalian, F. Stephen Hodi, Julie R. Brahmer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 12.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
James Larkin, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.1K citations · Full text
PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance
Paul C. Tumeh, Christina L. Harview, Jennifer H. Yearley et al. · Nature · 2014 · 6.6K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Pathology +14
Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes
Michael S. Lawrence, Petar Stojanov, Paz Polak et al. · Nature · 2013 · 5.7K citations · Full text