Concepedia

Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: <i>A randomized clinical trial</i>

Ciara Campbell, Declan T Millett, Niamh Kelly, Marie Cooke, Michael Cronin

The Angle Orthodontist · 2019 · 25 citations · 22 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

Phase 1 treatment duration, number of appliance breakages, occlusal outcome, and patient and parent perspectives were similar in 11-14 year olds with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated using the FR2 or MTB appliance.

References

22

The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority

Peter Brook, William C. Shaw · European Journal of Orthodontics · 1989 · 1.1K citations

The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity

Stephen Richmond, William C. Shaw, Kevin O’Brien et al. · European Journal of Orthodontics · 1992 · 635 citations

, , +22

Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects

Kevin O’Brien, Jean L. Wright, Frances Conboy et al. · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2003 · 365 citations

, , +6

Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial

Kevin O’Brien, Jean L. Wright, Frances Conboy et al. · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2003 · 269 citations

,

Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester

Nicky Mandall · European Journal of Orthodontics · 2000 · 233 citations · Full text

, , +15