Environment International · 2019 · 101 citations · 18 references
Public HealthEnvironmental EngineeringEnvironmental SciencesAir PollutionEnvironmental HealthMachine LearningAir PollutantsAir Pollution MeasurementAir Pollution ModelingAir QualityExposure AssessmentParticulate MatterAdverse Health EffectsAirborne Particle MonitoringAtmospheric MonitoringCalibration Method ValidationControlled Experiment DesignLinear RegressionMeasurement Model CalibrationParticulate Matter Monitoring
BACKGROUND: Particle air pollution has adverse health effects, and low-cost monitoring among a large population group is an effective method for performing environmental health studies. However, concern about the accuracy of low-cost monitors has affected their popularization in monitoring projects. OBJECTIVE: To calibrate a low-cost particle monitor (HK-B3, Hike, China) through a controlled exposure experiment. METHODS: monitors, and ten-fold validation was used to test the model. In addition, we used a linear regression model to compare the results of the machine learning model. A calibration method was established for the low-cost monitors, and it can be used to apply the monitors in future air pollution monitoring projects. RESULTS: = 0.87). The random forest model showed better performance than the traditional linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided an effective calibration method to support the accuracy of low-cost monitors. The machine learning method based on the calibration model established in our study can increase the effectiveness of future air pollution and health studies.
18
Urban Ambient Particle Metrics and Health
Richard Atkinson, Gary W. Fuller, H R Anderson et al. · Epidemiology · 2010 · 351 citations
Renjie Chen, Huichu Li, Jing Cai et al. · Environmental Health Perspectives · 2018 · 186 citations · Full text