Gastroenterology Research · 2019 · 33 citations · 15 references
In a real-world setting, the rate of clinical response and remission was higher among patients with CD who received ADA compared to UST. Of note, however, despite the small sample sizes of TNF-experienced patients who received ADA and TNF-naive patients who received UST, the higher effectiveness of ADA in inducing clinical response and indeed remission among patients with CD with active disease appears to primarily be driven by those who are TNF-naive. Among TNF-experienced patients, UST may be superior in inducing clinical response and equally effective in inducing clinical remission when compared to ADA. Based on this study, one may infer that among TNF-experienced patients with CD with active disease, one could consider switching to an agent such as UST instead of a second approved TNF blocker. However, larger studies comparing the two agents are required.
15
Infliximab, Azathioprine, or Combination Therapy for Crohn's Disease
Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, William J. Sandborn, Walter Reinisch et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 3.1K citations · Full text
Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease
William J. Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan, Paul Rutgeerts et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn’s Disease
Brian G. Feagan, William J. Sandborn, Christopher Gasink et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 1.7K citations · Full text