Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · 2019 · 52 citations · 17 references
MedicineRehabilitation MedicineAssistive TechnologyFunctional AssessmentPsychometricsAssistive DevicesAssistive Mobility DevicesMobility AidsMobility AssessmentMobility AssistanceTest ReliabilityAssistive Device EvaluationAssistive Technology EvaluationInternal Consistency ReliabilityIntraclass CorrelationMobility Device EvaluationQuestionnaire ReliabilityQuestionnaire ValidityTest-retest Reliability
OBJECTS: The aim of the study is the translation, culturally adaptation and validation of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) in an Italian population with users of mobility assistive device, through a cross sectional study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate internal consistency and test-retest reliability, Cronbach's? and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were respectively calculated. The WheelCon-M is administered together, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for validity. RESULTS: < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: the QUEST-IT 2.0 showed out good consistent results for reliability and validity. This scale will be very useful for doctors, researchers and occupational therapist in the valuation and management of mobility assistive device.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Italian version of the QUEST 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) in now available and health professionals can use it with more confidence.The QUEST-IT 2.0 is a valid and reliable assessment tool when used with a sample of assistive mobility device users.
17
Lidwine B. Mokkink, Caroline B. Terwee, Donald L. Patrick et al. · Quality of Life Research · 2010 · 4.2K citations · Full text