Croatian Medical Journal · 2019 · 13 citations · 29 references
Life SciencesClinical SciencesInternal MedicineAutoimmunityClinical Classification SystemsRheumatologyAutoimmune DiseasesAutoimmune Rheumatic DiseasesDiagnostic CriteriaDiagnostic EvaluationSystemic Autoimmune DiseaseSystemic Lupus ErythematosusClassification CriteriaCohort ConstructionDisease DurationLogistic RegressionPositive Predictive ValueReceiver Operating Characteristic AnalysisSensitivitySystemic Lupus Erythematosus Diagnostics
AIM: To validate Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-12 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-97 classification criteria on a patient cohort from the University Hospital Center Zagreb. METHODS: This retrospective study, conducted from 2014 to 2016, involved 308 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=146) and SLE-allied conditions (n=162). Patients' medical charts were evaluated by an expert rheumatologist to confirm the clinical diagnosis, regardless of the number of the ACR-97 criteria met. Overall sensitivity and specificity, as well as the sensitivity and specificity according to disease duration, were compared between ACR-97 and SLICC-12 classifications. Predictive value for SLE for both classifications was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The SLICC-12 criteria had significantly higher sensitivity in early disase, which increased with disease duration. The ACR-97 criteria had higher specificity. The specificity of the SLICC-12 criteria was low and decreased with disease duration. Regression analysis demonstrated the superiority of the SLICC-12 classification criteria over the ACR-97 criteria, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.801 and 0.780, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the SLICC-12 criteria were superior to the ACR-97 and were more sensitive for diagnosing early SLE, their specificity in our population was too low. The sensitivity of the SLICC-12 classification is increased by better defined clinical features within each criterion. Our results contribute to the current initiative for developing new criteria for SLE.
29
The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus
Eng M. Tan, Alan S. Cohen, James F. Fries et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatism · 1982 · 14.6K citations
Lawrence L. Kupper, David W. Hosmer, Stanley Lemeshow · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1990 · 7.7K citations
Michelle Petri, Ana‐Maria Orbai, Graciela S. Alarcón et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatism · 2012 · 5.3K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Clinical Classification Systems +11
Ricard Cervera, Munther A. Khamashta, Josep Font et al. · Medicine · 1993 · 982 citations